The 5D Mark III has a larger screen size of 3.2 inches compared to the 5D Mark II’s 3 inches. This provides a better, larger view for composing and reviewing images. Additionally, the 5D Mark III boasts a higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, which results in a sharper and clearer display than the 5D Mark II’s 920,000 dots. 2.05 lb. 930 g. 2.05 lb. The Canon EOS 5DS emerges as the winner with a score of 69/100, while the Canon EOS 5D Mark III trails behind with a score of 65/100. Both cameras are DSLRs, were launched in the 2010s, and share identical dimensions of 152 x 116 x 76mm. The EOS 5DS has a slight advantage in weight, being 20g lighter at 930g.
weather-sealed (splashproof) Canon EOS-1D Mark IV. Canon EOS 5D Mark III. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. screen resolution. 920k dots. 1040k dots. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos.
has a microphone input. Canon EOS 50D. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack. Canon EOS 50D. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.
Why is Canon EOS 5D Mark IV better than Canon EOS-1D X Mark III? 1.51x more megapixels (main camera)? 30.4MP vs 20.1MP Has phase-detection autofocus for videos? 360g lighter? 890g vs 1.25kg Has a built-in HDR mode? Has a 24p cinema mode?
Here's the thing though, I've gotten fantastic high speed images with a 5D mark ii and a Nikon D800e (3.9 and 4 fps respectfully) and the image quality is gorgeous. But I've gotten the images that I've wanted more often with a Canon 1D Mark IV at 10 fps because not only does it have more fps, but the sensor is designed for more continuous shooting.
3s3s. 901 623 434 527 536 363 759 513

canon 1d mark iv vs 5d mark iii